Current Status of Nurses in Support of Children with Parents with Cancer in Akita Prefecture

Purpose: To clarify current status of nurses in support of children with parents with cancer in Akita Prefecture. Method: Questionnaire surveys were administered on nurses in Akita prefecture. Their experiences, educational backgrounds, and ability to recognize the need for support were examined. Descriptive statistics were used for the attributes, and chi-square test or Fisher’s exact Test or Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to examine the relationship between the support experience and the attributes (p<0.05). The contents of their open comments were then analyzed using a qualitative integration method. Results: Responses were obtained from 141 nurses at 10 facilities (collection rate: 43.9%). Of the 141 nurses, 135 (96%) recognized the necessity of support for children, and 28 (20%) already had experience supporting them. The contents of support were [direct support for children] [support for children through parents] [support through coordination and coordination with resources]. Most apparent difficulties in support were “Intervene for children” and “to have a connection with children”. Conclusion: The results indicate that nurses recognize that children need support. However, they lack experience in providing such support. It is necessary to enhance support by learning support methods and sharing information with other occupations. Support from parents is important when children cannot be met.

Efficacy of pharmacist-palliative care physician cooperative screening activity

The primary aims of this study were; 1) to investigate the appropriateness of the analgesic therapy in hospitalized cancer patients, and 2) to explore the effects of the screening system by a pharmacist-palliative care physician screening team on analgesic regimens.<BR>The pharmacist-palliative care physician screeningteam screened consecutive cancer patients about the adequacy of analgesic treatments and provided written recommendations to primary physicians. Inclusion criteria were cancer patients admitted to oncology wards, not having been consulted to palliative care team, and receiving opioid or chemotherapy. Of 62 patients screened, analgesia was inadequate in 44%, and preemptive pharmacological treatments for opioid-induced nausea and constipation was lacking in 42% of 43 patients who had received opioids. The team provided a total of 80 recommendations for 52 patients, and primary physicians followed 94% of the recommendations within one week. The pharmacist-palliative care physician screening team may contribute to better analgesia in patients not having been consulted to the specialized palliative care service.